Zhejiang Textile Strengthen Innovation Adjustment And Pformation

Zhejiang's economy started with light spinning.

However, "once we get the world, we can not rule the world at once."

One of the major strategic issues facing the Zhejiang economy is to accelerate the pformation of the economic structure after the per capita GDP exceeds US $6000 and continue to promote sound and rapid economic and social development.

Currently, there are three main problems in Zhejiang's economic structure: first, the low proportion of the service sector; the two is the high proportion of traditional labor intensive industries, and the three is the lack of structural innovation.

In 2008, the third industry accounted for only 41% of the total GDP in Zhejiang, which was 10 to 30 percentage points lower than that of similar countries and regions with similar development level. Meanwhile, according to our analysis, the proportion of traditional labor-intensive industries in Zhejiang in 2008 was roughly 10 percentage points higher than the national average.

Structural problems magnified the negative impact of the global financial crisis, and Zhejiang's economy suffered more serious difficulties in 2008 than the fraternal provinces.

When it comes to structural innovation, many people may not be able to accept it.

Zhejiang's enterprise system innovation is ahead of the whole country. The number of three patent licenses in Zhejiang has grown rapidly in recent years, ranking the top in the country.

However, in terms of economic structure, there are serious problems of path dependence and insufficient innovation in Zhejiang.

(c) the comparative analysis of the structural changes in manufacturing can illustrate this problem. In the three period since 1991, in the period of "85" (1991 - 1995), the change rate of manufacturing structure in Zhejiang was lower than the national average level, and also significantly lower than that in Jiangsu, Shanghai, Guangdong and Shandong.

In the period of "95" (1996-2000), Zhejiang's manufacturing industry changed slightly, slightly better.

However, from 2001 to 2007, the structural change rate of Zhejiang's manufacturing industry was only slightly higher than that of the national average and Jiangsu, much lower than that of Shanghai, Guangdong and Shandong.

The main feature of this path dependence and insufficient innovation is that the traditional industries such as textiles and clothing share a relatively long term.

In 1985, the output value of Zhejiang's textile and garment feather and down industry was 27.3%. The proportion of output value of this group of industries was 18.4%, and Zhejiang was 8.9 percentage points higher than that of the whole country.

By 2008, according to our preliminary analysis, the output share of Zhejiang's industries still increased to 21.3%, and only 20 percentage points decreased by 6 percentage points in the past 20 years. The proportion of the output value of this group of industries decreased by 9.9 percentage points, accounting for only 8.5% of the national industry.

From 1985 to 2008, the output share of Zhejiang's industries rose from only 12.3% to 14.5%, rising by only 2.2 percentage points, while the whole country increased from 8.8% to 17%, up 9.2 percentage points.

At present, the leading industries in Shanghai and Jiangsu are the electronics industry. The Yangtze River Delta region has only Zhejiang Province, but still takes the textile industry as the leading industry, and the industrial level is obviously low.

Here, there is a very intriguing paradox of structural change.

Such an important reason for serious path dependence and insufficient structural innovation is the shrewdness and persistence of Zhejiang entrepreneurs.

Zhejiang entrepreneurs can squeeze oil from the chaff.

Therefore, when the national textile and garment industry began to slow down in 2000, the Zhejiang enterprises became more and more prosperous, defeated the domestic competitors, the export increased significantly, and the proportion of the industry in the province increased.

The strong competitiveness of many textile and garment enterprises in Zhejiang has made Zhejiang's economy unwittingly enter an industrial trap.

A major reason for the decline of Zhejiang's economic growth is the lack of support for traditional industries such as textiles and clothing, and the lack of support from emerging industries such as electronics and electronics.

Zhejiang lacks the innovation of individual enterprises, but lacks the overall upgrading of enterprises. Zhejiang lacks product innovation but lacks structural pformation.

In the present economic development of Zhejiang, structural innovation is a more urgent problem of development strategy.

In terms of enterprises, structural innovation is mainly about industrial structure innovation, organizational structure innovation, marketing structure innovation, technological innovation and so on.

From the government's point of view, it is mainly about strategic structural innovation, functional structure innovation, and financial expenditure structure innovation.

Of course, there may be some other major structural innovation issues that need further in-depth study.

The implementation of light textile breakthroughs is a major aspect of structural innovation.

From a single enterprise, further strengthening the textile and garment industry is likely to be a rational behavior.

However, from the perspective of Zhejiang's economy, we must reduce the proportion of its output value under the premise of upgrading traditional industries such as textiles and garments, and speed up the proportion of output value of high-tech industries at the same time.

Obviously, this requirement must be concretely implemented in enterprises.

Zhejiang's many traditional industries such as light textile industry must get rid of the path dependence as soon as possible, and create a major structural pformation of enterprises, that is, the new situation of "the two venture".

Ningbo Shanshan Group is a model of structural innovation.

The clothing listed company achieved sales income of 1 billion 150 million yuan in the first half of 2008, an increase of 14.5% over the same period last year, and the proportion of clothing dropped to 60.1%, and lithium battery materials accounted for 39.9%.

The priority of implementing the service sector is another major task of structural innovation.

There are two levels. One is to speed up the development of modern services such as finance, capital, tourism and consultation, and to enhance the service industry's role in promoting production and life. The other level is to accelerate the separation of services in manufacturing enterprises, namely, to separate, from the manufacturing enterprises, procurement, sales, development, design, planning, logistics services, field management, and so on, so as to form a highly specialized and socialized production and operation.

The common interest relationship is stronger than the administrative relationship, and the socialization service is better than the self service.

The benefits that enterprises increase from specialization and socialization are far greater than their costs, and the whole society is highly promoted by highly specialized and socialized ones.

We should enhance the power of structural innovation, strengthen the power of structural innovation, and consolidate the micro foundation of structural innovation.

Generally speaking, the driving force of structural innovation is determined by a group of incentive and constraint factors in the objective environment.

The problem now is that the objective environment has been or is undergoing fundamental changes. The two most important changes are the "low two" pattern, which is based on the supply of low cost labor and the market demand based on low-level products, which has changed or is undergoing a turning point. The time for major structural innovation is ripe.

If the objective environment has changed, if we do not grasp the major structural innovation again, we will lead to a series of lags, which will seriously damage the future economic development.

Therefore, at present, the key to enhancing the power of structural innovation is to recognize the situation and take actions to create a new situation with innovation.

Local governments should actively adjust their strategic structure.

A major advantage of our economic development is that we have a large number of established, advanced and practical institutional knowledge and technical knowledge, and are in the era of "knowledge taking".

As long as local governments are "sensible people", under the scientific and reasonable institutional mechanism, they can play a positive role in accelerating regional economic development.

In the current process of major structural innovation, governments at all levels should thoroughly investigate and study, actively analyze and judge the situation, fully grasp the actual situation, correctly handle all kinds of relations between economic and social development, formulate and implement a series of major ideas, development strategies and specific policies to accelerate local economic and social development, and form a scientific and complete "policy bundle".

It is suggested that the government should implement a policy of universal benefit and no difference in the structural innovation of enterprises.

Because in the process of structural innovation, there will be more or less a small number of business failures, but most enterprises will gain greater benefits.

However, even frustrated enterprises will make great progress in structural innovation, because their frustrations are common knowledge of entrepreneurs.

Therefore, as long as the enterprise meets certain conditions set, the government should give unconditional support in accordance with its commitments.

The purpose of this design is to reduce the cost of policy implementation, and the two is to prevent rent seeking in the implementation of policies.

In promoting structural innovation, the government and enterprises may need to pay attention to two specific problems: first, play the role of professional managers.

Enterprises are the main body of structural innovation. Professional managers are the implementers of enterprise structural innovation, and they are the backbone of enterprises.

Professional managers grew up mainly with entrepreneurs in the long and intimate work together, and only a few were introduced externally.

In this regard, the government should strengthen the cultivation mechanism of professional managers and the market flow mechanism, and actively do a good job of communication between entrepreneurs and professional managers. At the same time, it is necessary to support civil servants and public institutions to go out of the "Besieged City" and become professional managers.

Two is to give full play to the positive role of new and new human beings in structural innovation.

In addition to the younger generation, the term "new human" focuses more on young people who have too many different ideas with their fathers.

They will produce and run new products and services in a new entrepreneurial philosophy and way on the platform built by their fathers.

The older generation of entrepreneurs should still play an active role, but we should also correctly understand that enterprises that are young people stand out are dynamic enterprises. They need to be decisive to the young generation in critical moments and key areas.

The government should actively create conditions to support and nurture new human beings and cultivate a vibrant and innovative army.

More information on shoes and hats, and enter the editor in charge: Wang Xiaonan